DISContinuum DISCussion

Disc Golf Related => Leagues & Tourneys => Topic started by: Dan Michler on August 09, 2009, 05:56:40 AM

Title: pittsburgh open
Post by: Dan Michler on August 09, 2009, 05:56:40 AM
Dana in 6th after day 1 at the pittsburgh A tier.  nice shooting Dana, and good luck!
Title: Re: pittsburgh open
Post by: danav on August 10, 2009, 07:22:46 PM
Moraine is AWESOME.  Probably one of the best courses I've ever played. 

I had a USDGC spot in my sights but my 4th round was pretty poor.
Title: Re: pittsburgh open
Post by: roman on August 10, 2009, 07:26:47 PM
Moraine is sweet indeed. I was out there on Wednesday. I hit up Deer Lakes, Knob Hill, and Schenley on Thursday, then IUP on Friday. Did you guys play Deer Lakes? I like it even better than Moraine, but they're both fantastic courses. I wish I knew you were there, I would've played a round with you.
Title: Re: pittsburgh open
Post by: jack on August 11, 2009, 08:21:04 AM
Quote from: danav on August 10, 2009, 07:22:46 PM
Moraine is AWESOME.  Probably one of the best courses I've ever played. 

I had a USDGC spot in my sights but my 4th round was pretty poor.

Am I retarded? (Wait, don't answer that.) Avery, Bennett, Barry, Schick, and Horne already qualified. How did you not get a spot?
Title: Re: pittsburgh open
Post by: Dan Michler on August 11, 2009, 09:55:31 AM
I agree with Jack on that one.  Top 5 players qualify, excluding those who have already qualified.  The top 5 in the tournament are listed on the USDGC website's list of eligible competitors.  Dana is ranked 4th among players who are not on the list.  It would seem you earned your invitation in Pittsburgh.
Title: Re: pittsburgh open
Post by: tacimala on August 12, 2009, 09:23:32 AM
Looking at the thread on the PDGA site it looks like some went to masters or grandmasters players that had better overall scores. Kind of cheesy, but that's how they have been doing it.
Title: Re: pittsburgh open
Post by: Dan Michler on August 12, 2009, 10:23:43 AM
Quote from: tacimala on August 12, 2009, 09:23:32 AM
Looking at the thread on the PDGA site it looks like some went to masters or grandmasters players that had better overall scores. Kind of cheesy, but that's how they have been doing it.

Wow, thats a terrible decision in my opinion.  A player should have to choose between going for 'easy money' in the Masters field or attempting to gain a qualifying spot by playing with the big boys.  You can't logically give them the best of both worlds like that when they weren't even competing in the same field.  Or maybe someone just really wanted Joe Mela and Al Schack to earn their spots.....
Title: Re: pittsburgh open
Post by: tacimala on August 12, 2009, 10:35:49 AM
If there were other divisions offered at USDGC, then I could understand, but I agree with you based on that same logic. Dana may have been in a better position to know what to do in the final round had it been otherwise. Good shooting either way buddy!
Title: Re: pittsburgh open
Post by: SERG on August 12, 2009, 07:01:57 PM
Great work, Dana. Keep it up this weekend.
I haven't played Maple Hill since the ice storm and changes that have been made but had a great time at the course two years ago. Looking forward to the coverage.

As for the USDGC qualifying, take a look here: Qualifying Document (http://www.usdgc.com/files09/09_USDGC_Qualifying.pdf)
Looks like it's the top scores, as long as everyone plays the same layout and days.